netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] net: Various VRF patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <572AC884.9090700@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 May 2016 22:13:56 -0600
From:	David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/13] net: Various VRF patches

On 5/4/16 9:59 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> Date: Wed,  4 May 2016 20:33:17 -0700
>
>> Various fixes and features for VRF over the past few months.
>
> I really dislike a patch series that is simply a hodge podge of
> unrelated things.
>
> Please group your changes into logical bunches, and submit them as
> groups one at a time.

I can send them out based on the grouping mentioned in the cover letter, 
but they apply in order. I believe patch 4 is the only one that is not 
order dependent.

After several days of wrestling with the order of patches 7-13 they are 
all inherently dependent on patch 5. If you look at the diff summary 
most of the code changes are to l3mdev.{c,h} and vrf.c.

I will break out the first 4 as separate patches and re-send.