lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20160505.002549.868922626404541926.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 00:25:49 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: eric.dumazet@...il.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: two more missing bh disable From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 15:27:29 -0700 > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> > > percpu_counter only have protection against preemption. > > TCP stack uses them possibly from BH, so we need BH protection > in contexts that could be run in process context > > Fixes: c10d9310edf5 ("tcp: do not assume TCP code is non preemptible") > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists