[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160506222320.GB2073@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 00:23:20 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/21] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: factorize MAC
address setting
> @@ -378,6 +385,7 @@ enum mv88e6xxx_cap {
> #define MV88E6XXX_FLAG_EEPROM BIT(MV88E6XXX_CAP_EEPROM)
> #define MV88E6XXX_FLAG_PPU BIT(MV88E6XXX_CAP_PPU)
> #define MV88E6XXX_FLAG_SMI_PHY BIT(MV88E6XXX_CAP_SMI_PHY)
> +#define MV88E6XXX_FLAG_SWITCH_MAC BIT(MV88E6XXX_CAP_SWITCH_MAC_WOL_WOF)
> #define MV88E6XXX_FLAG_TEMP BIT(MV88E6XXX_CAP_TEMP)
> #define MV88E6XXX_FLAG_TEMP_LIMIT BIT(MV88E6XXX_CAP_TEMP_LIMIT)
There is a general pattern here that the flag has a name derived from
the capability. Except you dropped the WOL_WOF here. It would probably
be better to not have WOL_WOF at all.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists