[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160506110325.GA2420@salvia>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 13:03:25 +0200
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Joe Stringer <joe@....org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
fw@...len.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netfilter: nf_conntrack: Use net_mutex for helper
unregistration.
Hi Joe,
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 03:50:37PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote:
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c
> index 3b40ec575cd5..6860b19be406 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_helper.c
> @@ -449,10 +449,10 @@ void nf_conntrack_helper_unregister(struct nf_conntrack_helper *me)
> */
> synchronize_rcu();
>
> - rtnl_lock();
> + mutex_lock(&net_mutex);
> for_each_net(net)
> __nf_conntrack_helper_unregister(me, net);
> - rtnl_unlock();
> + mutex_unlock(&net_mutex);
This simple solution works because we have no .exit callbacks in any
of our helpers. Otherwise, the helper code may be already gone by when
the worker has a chance to run to release the netns.
If so, probably I can append this as comment to this function so we
don't forget. If we ever have .exit callbacks (I don't expect so), we
would need to wait for worker completion.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists