netdev - [PATCH net-next 7/7] samples/bpf: add verifier tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 May 2016 19:49:15 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To:	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 7/7] samples/bpf: add verifier tests

add few tests for "pointer to packet" logic of the verifier

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
 samples/bpf/test_verifier.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+)

diff --git a/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 9eba8d1d9dcc..fe2fcec98c1f 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -1448,6 +1448,86 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
 		.result = ACCEPT,
 		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
 	},
+	{
+		"pkt: test1",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	},
+	{
+		"pkt: test2",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_3),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_5, 14),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_4, 15),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 7),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_4, BPF_REG_3, 12),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, BPF_REG_4, 14),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_4),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_2, 48),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_RSH, BPF_REG_2, 48),
+			BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_3),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, 8),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1, 1),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 4),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.result = ACCEPT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	},
+	{
+		"pkt: test3",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access off=76",
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER,
+	},
+	{
+		"pkt: test4",
+		.insns = {
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
+				    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
+			BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
+			BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
+			BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
+			BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
+			BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
+			BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+		},
+		.errstr = "cannot write",
+		.result = REJECT,
+		.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
+	},
 };
 
 static int probe_filter_length(struct bpf_insn *fp)
-- 
2.8.0