lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1462550263-9742-1-git-send-email-shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri,  6 May 2016 18:57:43 +0300
From:	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
To:	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>, shmulik.ladkani@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] Documentation/networking: more accurate LCO explanation

In few places the term "ones-complement sum" was used but the actual
meaning is "the complement of the ones-complement sum".

Signed-off-by: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
---

 I assume readers interpret the term "ones-complement sum" as the sum
 using one's complement arithmentic, without the final bitwise
 complement of sum's result.
 Hence I added "the complement of" where applicable.

 Documentation/networking/checksum-offloads.txt | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/checksum-offloads.txt b/Documentation/networking/checksum-offloads.txt
index de2a327766..9567200e1f 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/checksum-offloads.txt
+++ b/Documentation/networking/checksum-offloads.txt
@@ -69,17 +69,17 @@ LCO: Local Checksum Offload
 LCO is a technique for efficiently computing the outer checksum of an
  encapsulated datagram when the inner checksum is due to be offloaded.
 The ones-complement sum of a correctly checksummed TCP or UDP packet is
- equal to the sum of the pseudo header, because everything else gets
- 'cancelled out' by the checksum field.  This is because the sum was
+ equal to the complement of the sum of the pseudo header, because everything
+ else gets 'cancelled out' by the checksum field.  This is because the sum was
  complemented before being written to the checksum field.
 More generally, this holds in any case where the 'IP-style' ones complement
  checksum is used, and thus any checksum that TX Checksum Offload supports.
 That is, if we have set up TX Checksum Offload with a start/offset pair, we
  know that _after the device has filled in that checksum_, the ones
  complement sum from csum_start to the end of the packet will be equal to
- _whatever value we put in the checksum field beforehand_.  This allows us
- to compute the outer checksum without looking at the payload: we simply
- stop summing when we get to csum_start, then add the 16-bit word at
+ the complement of _whatever value we put in the checksum field beforehand_.
+ This allows us to compute the outer checksum without looking at the payload:
+ we simply stop summing when we get to csum_start, then add the 16-bit word at
  (csum_start + csum_offset).
 Then, when the true inner checksum is filled in (either by hardware or by
  skb_checksum_help()), the outer checksum will become correct by virtue of
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ