netdev - Re: [PATCH] Documentation/networking: more accurate LCO explanation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160506.125020.467917589097597961.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 06 May 2016 12:50:20 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	alexander.duyck@...il.com
Cc:	shmulik.ladkani@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	ecree@...arflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/networking: more accurate LCO explanation

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 09:29:56 -0700

> I don't really see the point of using an underscore before and after
> that statement.  If it was only one or two words it might work for
> emphasis but the statement is large enough that starting it with an
> underscore just makes it harder to read.

Agreed.