lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0UdM1aQF8cLWVLXMmXyJnMHkZUum8YyKsyCSVFvBALmyCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 May 2016 19:03:24 -0700
From:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 00/11] ipv6: Enable GUEoIPv6 and more fixes
 for v6 tunneling

On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Alexander Duyck
> <alexander.duyck@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com> wrote:
>>> This patch set:
>>>   - Fixes GRE6 to process translate flags correctly from configuration
>>>   - Adds support for GSO and GRO for ip6ip6 and ip4ip6
>>>   - Add support for FOU and GUE in IPv6
>>>   - Support GRE, ip6ip6 and ip4ip6 over FOU/GUE
>>>   - Fixes ip6_input to deal with UDP encapsulations
>>>   - Some other minor fixes
>>>
>>> v2:
>>>   - Removed a check of GSO types in MPLS
>>>   - Define GSO type SKB_GSO_IPXIP6 and SKB_GSO_IPXIP4 (based on input
>>>     from Alexander)
>>>   - Don't define GSO types specifally for IP6IP6 and IP4IP6, above
>>>     fix makes that uncessary
>>>   - Don't bother clearing encapsulation flag in UDP tunnel segment
>>>     (another item suggested by Alexander).
>>>
>>> v3:
>>>   - Address some minor comments from Alexander
>>>
>>> Tested:
>>>    Tested a variety of case, but not the full matrix (which is quite
>>>    large now). Most of the obivous cases (e.g. GRE) work fine. Still
>>>    some issues probably with GSO/GRO being effective in all cases.
>>>
>>>     - IPv4/GRE/GUE/IPv6 with RCO
>>>       1 TCP_STREAM
>>>         6616 Mbps
>>>       200 TCP_RR
>>>         1244043 tps
>>>         141/243/446 90/95/99% latencies
>>>         86.61% CPU utilization
>>>     - IPv6/GRE/GUE/IPv6 with RCO
>>>       1 TCP_STREAM
>>>         6940 Mbps
>>>       200 TCP_RR
>>>         1270903 tps
>>>         138/236/440 90/95/99% latencies
>>>         87.51% CPU utilization
>>>
>>>      - IP6IP6
>>>       1 TCP_STREAM
>>>         2576 Mbps
>>>       200 TCP_RR
>>>         498981 tps
>>>         388/498/631 90/95/99% latencies
>>>         19.75% CPU utilization (1 CPU saturated)
>>>
>>>      - IP6IP6/GUE/IPv6 with RCO
>>>       1 TCP_STREAM
>>>         1854 Mbps
>>>       200 TCP_RR
>>>         1233818 tps
>>>         143/244/451 90/95/99% latencies
>>>         87.57 CPU utilization
>>>
>>>      - IP4IP6
>>>       1 TCP_STREAM
>>>       200 TCP_RR
>>>         763774 tps
>>>         250/318/466 90/95/99% latencies
>>>         35.25% CPU utilization (1 CPU saturated)
>>>
>>>      - GRE with keyid
>>>       200 TCP_RR
>>>         744173 tps
>>>         258/332/461 90/95/99% latencies
>>>         34.59% CPU utilization (1 CPU saturated)
>>
>> So I tried testing your patch set and it looks like I cannot get GRE
>> working for any netperf test.  If I pop the patches off it is even
>> worse since it looks like patch 3 fixes some tunnel flags issues, but
>> still doesn't resolve all the issues introduced with b05229f44228
>> ("gre6: Cleanup GREv6 transmit path, call common GRE functions").
>> Reverting the entire patch seems to resolve the issues, but I will try
>> to pick it apart tonight to see if I can find the other issues that
>> weren't addressed in this patch series.
>>
>
> Can you give details about configuration, test you're running, and HW?

The issue looks like it may be specific to ip6gretap.  I'm running the
test over an i40e adapter, but it shouldn't make much difference.  I'm
thinking it may have something to do with the MTU configuration as
that is one of the things I am noticing has changed between the
working and the broken version of the code.

- Alex

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ