netdev - [PATCH 19/36] netfilter: conntrack: small refactoring of conntrack seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1462819614-5402-20-git-send-email-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date:	Mon,  9 May 2016 20:46:37 +0200
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 19/36] netfilter: conntrack: small refactoring of conntrack seq_printf

From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>

The iteration process is lockless, so we test if the conntrack object is
eligible for printing (e.g. is AF_INET) after obtaining the reference
count.

Once we put all conntracks into same hash table we might see more
entries that need to be skipped.

So add a helper and first perform the test in a lockless fashion
for fast skip.

Once we obtain the reference count, just repeat the check.

Note that this refactoring also includes a missing check for unconfirmed
conntrack entries due to slab rcu object re-usage, so they need to be
skipped since they are not part of the listing.

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
 .../netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c   | 24 +++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c
index f0dfe92..483cf79 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4_compat.c
@@ -114,6 +114,19 @@ static inline void ct_show_secctx(struct seq_file *s, const struct nf_conn *ct)
 }
 #endif
 
+static bool ct_seq_should_skip(const struct nf_conn *ct,
+			       const struct nf_conntrack_tuple_hash *hash)
+{
+	/* we only want to print DIR_ORIGINAL */
+	if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(hash))
+		return true;
+
+	if (nf_ct_l3num(ct) != AF_INET)
+		return true;
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 static int ct_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
 {
 	struct nf_conntrack_tuple_hash *hash = v;
@@ -123,14 +136,15 @@ static int ct_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	NF_CT_ASSERT(ct);
-	if (unlikely(!atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use)))
+	if (ct_seq_should_skip(ct, hash))
 		return 0;
 
+	if (unlikely(!atomic_inc_not_zero(&ct->ct_general.use)))
+		return 0;
 
-	/* we only want to print DIR_ORIGINAL */
-	if (NF_CT_DIRECTION(hash))
-		goto release;
-	if (nf_ct_l3num(ct) != AF_INET)
+	/* check if we raced w. object reuse */
+	if (!nf_ct_is_confirmed(ct) ||
+	    ct_seq_should_skip(ct, hash))
 		goto release;
 
 	l3proto = __nf_ct_l3proto_find(nf_ct_l3num(ct));
-- 
2.1.4