netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v2 1/6] net sched: vlan action fix late binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5730797D.9020100@mojatatu.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 May 2016 07:50:21 -0400
From:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 1/6] net sched: vlan action fix late binding

On 16-05-08 11:08 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Sun, May 8, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote:
[..]
>> +       aexists = tcf_hash_check(tn, parm->index, a, bind);
>
>
> I think 'exists' is a better name than 'aexists', shorter and clear.
>

aexists is more specific (doesnt quiet apply to this case but has better
grep-ability).
exists looked too generic - initially I was going to have act_exists. 
Yes, it is a tiny but ocd detail. Let me know if you feel strongly
and i will change it in next update.

>> +               if (aexists)
>> +                       tcf_hash_release(a, bind);
>
>
> Introduce a goto to reduce duplicated cleanup code?
>

Will do.

cheers,
jamal