lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 10 May 2016 09:43:16 +0300
From:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
	Sara Sharon <sara.sharon@...el.com>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the wireless-drivers tree

Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:

> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
>
> between commit:
>
>   5c08b0f5026f ("iwlwifi: mvm: don't override the rate with the AMSDU len")
>
> from the wireless-drivers tree and commit:
>
>   d8fe484470dd ("iwlwifi: mvm: add support for new TX CMD API")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

I'm planning to fix this by merging wireless-drivers to
wireless-drivers-next later today and most likely tomorrow send a
wireless-drivers-next pull request to Dave.

-- 
Kalle Valo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists