[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <c74ebf3e68d0207e95f71086693916fe99f10658.1463075515.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 01:51:55 +0800
From: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
To: network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH net] driver: ixgbevf: ixgbevf_write/read_posted_mbx should use IXGBE_ERR_MBX to initialize ret_val
Now ixgbevf_write/read_posted_mbx use -IXGBE_ERR_MBX as the initiative
return value, but it's incorrect, cause in ixgbevf_vlan_rx_add_vid(),
it use err == IXGBE_ERR_MBX, the err returned from mac.ops.set_vfta,
and in ixgbevf_set_vfta_vf, it return from write/read_posted. so we
should initialize err with IXGBE_ERR_MBX, instead of -IXGBE_ERR_MBX.
With this fix, the other functions that called it also can work well,
cause they only care about if err is 0 or not.
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/mbx.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/mbx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/mbx.c
index dc68fea..567ed6d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/mbx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/mbx.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static s32 ixgbevf_poll_for_ack(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
static s32 ixgbevf_read_posted_mbx(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size)
{
struct ixgbe_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
- s32 ret_val = -IXGBE_ERR_MBX;
+ s32 ret_val = IXGBE_ERR_MBX;
if (!mbx->ops.read)
goto out;
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ out:
static s32 ixgbevf_write_posted_mbx(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size)
{
struct ixgbe_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
- s32 ret_val = -IXGBE_ERR_MBX;
+ s32 ret_val = IXGBE_ERR_MBX;
/* exit if either we can't write or there isn't a defined timeout */
if (!mbx->ops.write || !mbx->timeout)
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists