lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2016 13:02:11 -0700
From:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To:	Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
	Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2] udp: Resolve NULL pointer dereference over
 flow-based vxlan device

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com> wrote:
> The following trace is seen when receiving a DHCP request over a flow-based
> VXLAN tunnel.  I believe this is caused by the metadata dst having a NULL
> dev value and as a result dev_net(dev) is causing a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> To resolve this I am replacing the check for skb_dst() with skb_valid_dst()
> so that we do not attempt to use the metadata dst to retrieve a device in
> order to determine the network namespace.

Why does UDP layer need to care about tunnel layer things?

If the problem is really what you describe, then the tunnel layer
should reset that dst after finish.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ