netdev - [net-next 02/14] e1000e: Cleanup consistency in ret

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 May 2016 16:43:43 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	davem@...emloft.net
Cc:	Brian Walsh <brian@...sh.ws>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, jogreene@...hat.com,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 02/14] e1000e: Cleanup consistency in ret_val variable usage

From: Brian Walsh <brian@...sh.ws>

Fixed the file to use a consistent ret_val for return value checking.

Signed-off-by: Brian Walsh <brian@...sh.ws>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
index 269087c..671256d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -3368,12 +3368,12 @@ static int e1000e_write_uc_addr_list(struct net_device *netdev)
 		 * combining
 		 */
 		netdev_for_each_uc_addr(ha, netdev) {
-			int rval;
+			int ret_val;
 
 			if (!rar_entries)
 				break;
-			rval = hw->mac.ops.rar_set(hw, ha->addr, rar_entries--);
-			if (rval < 0)
+			ret_val = hw->mac.ops.rar_set(hw, ha->addr, rar_entries--);
+			if (ret_val < 0)
 				return -ENOMEM;
 			count++;
 		}
@@ -6965,7 +6965,7 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	int bars, i, err, pci_using_dac;
 	u16 eeprom_data = 0;
 	u16 eeprom_apme_mask = E1000_EEPROM_APME;
-	s32 rval = 0;
+	s32 ret_val = 0;
 
 	if (ei->flags2 & FLAG2_DISABLE_ASPM_L0S)
 		aspm_disable_flag = PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S;
@@ -7200,18 +7200,18 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 	} else if (adapter->flags & FLAG_APME_IN_CTRL3) {
 		if (adapter->flags & FLAG_APME_CHECK_PORT_B &&
 		    (adapter->hw.bus.func == 1))
-			rval = e1000_read_nvm(&adapter->hw,
+			ret_val = e1000_read_nvm(&adapter->hw,
 					      NVM_INIT_CONTROL3_PORT_B,
 					      1, &eeprom_data);
 		else
-			rval = e1000_read_nvm(&adapter->hw,
+			ret_val = e1000_read_nvm(&adapter->hw,
 					      NVM_INIT_CONTROL3_PORT_A,
 					      1, &eeprom_data);
 	}
 
 	/* fetch WoL from EEPROM */
-	if (rval)
-		e_dbg("NVM read error getting WoL initial values: %d\n", rval);
+	if (ret_val)
+		e_dbg("NVM read error getting WoL initial values: %d\n", ret_val);
 	else if (eeprom_data & eeprom_apme_mask)
 		adapter->eeprom_wol |= E1000_WUFC_MAG;
 
@@ -7231,10 +7231,10 @@ static int e1000_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
 		device_wakeup_enable(&pdev->dev);
 
 	/* save off EEPROM version number */
-	rval = e1000_read_nvm(&adapter->hw, 5, 1, &adapter->eeprom_vers);
+	ret_val = e1000_read_nvm(&adapter->hw, 5, 1, &adapter->eeprom_vers);
 
-	if (rval) {
-		e_dbg("NVM read error getting EEPROM version: %d\n", rval);
+	if (ret_val) {
+		e_dbg("NVM read error getting EEPROM version: %d\n", ret_val);
 		adapter->eeprom_vers = 0;
 	}
 
-- 
2.5.5