[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160514001341.GB3256@orkisz>
Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 02:13:41 +0200
From: Marcin Szewczyk <Marcin.Szewczyk@...ny.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: No "unreachable" response for an outgoing TCP connection when using
fwmark
Hi,
I hope this is the right group even though it concerns mainly
development but I have not found a better one.
I would like to route locally-generated traffic:
- to a TCP port "A" of host "H" via the interface "A",
- to a TCP port "B" of host "H" via the interface "B".
Interface "B" is sometimes unavailable. Then I would like the kernel to
notify the user with "Network is unreachable" error if one tries to
connect to the TCP port "B".
I have tried the following settings (when the interface "B" is down):
# iptables -t mangle -nvL OUTPUT
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 2 packets, 120 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
2 120 MARK all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 host-H-ip MARK set 0x64
(for simplicity the rule does not include ports yet)
# ip rule
0: from all lookup local
32765: from all fwmark 0x64 lookup 200
32766: from all lookup main
32767: from all lookup default
# ip route show table 200
prohibit default
There are no surprises when the interface "B" is available and the 200
table contains a regular routing rule.
But when the interface "B" is not available I get satisfactory results
only for ICMP and UDP:
$ ping host-H-ip
PING host-H-ip (host-H-ip) 56(84) bytes of data.
ping: sendmsg: Network is unreachable
$ nc -nuv host-H-ip 5000
(UNKNOWN) [host-H-ip] 5000 (?) open
foo
too many output retries : Network is unreachable
For TCP it just hangs:
$ nc -nv host-H-ip 5000
I have found some threads that seem to be connected with the topic:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=136633466813095&w=2
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg281954.html
http://netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.narkive.com/8ggjpr4G/netfilter-core-mangle-table-rules-are-not-taken-into-account-in-preliminary-routing-decision
Unfortunately, I still do not understand why I do not get "Network is
unreachable" for TCP as well. Could anybody explain it to me?
Best regards,
--
Marcin Szewczyk
http://wodny.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists