netdev - Re: What ixgbe devices support HWTSTAMP_FILTER

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 14 May 2016 11:55:11 -0700
From:	Guy Harris <guy@...m.mit.edu>
To:	jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com
Cc:	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
	"Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
Subject: Re: What ixgbe devices support HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL for hardware time stamping?

On May 14, 2016, at 12:41 AM, Jeff Kirsher <tarbal@...il.com> wrote:

> Are you planning to produce a patch or are you wanting us to do the work to
> fix the issue?  Just asking so that work is not duplicated.

I'm willing to produce the patches, although

	1) I don't currently have a platform set up to test whether they compile;

	2) I don't have hardware on which to test whether they work (the person who submitted

		https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/tcpdump/issues/393#issuecomment-218442072

	   does, although he doesn't have X550 hardware - I guess he wants hardware time stamping on an 82599EB; it sounds as if that won't work, and his patch to the driver won't give him what he wants);

	3) patches from the driver maintainers might 1) be more likely to do the right thing and 2) be more likely to be accepted.