lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 14 May 2016 11:55:11 -0700 From: Guy Harris <guy@...m.mit.edu> To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com Cc: Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>, "Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@...el.com> Subject: Re: What ixgbe devices support HWTSTAMP_FILTER_ALL for hardware time stamping? On May 14, 2016, at 12:41 AM, Jeff Kirsher <tarbal@...il.com> wrote: > Are you planning to produce a patch or are you wanting us to do the work to > fix the issue? Just asking so that work is not duplicated. I'm willing to produce the patches, although 1) I don't currently have a platform set up to test whether they compile; 2) I don't have hardware on which to test whether they work (the person who submitted https://github.com/the-tcpdump-group/tcpdump/issues/393#issuecomment-218442072 does, although he doesn't have X550 hardware - I guess he wants hardware time stamping on an 82599EB; it sounds as if that won't work, and his patch to the driver won't give him what he wants); 3) patches from the driver maintainers might 1) be more likely to do the right thing and 2) be more likely to be accepted.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists