lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 21:28:28 -0400 From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> To: netdev@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...oirfairelinux.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: remove bridge work Hi David, Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> writes: > Now that the bridge code defers the switchdev port state setting, there > is no need to defer the port STP state change within the mv88e6xxx code. > Thus get rid of the driver's bridge work code. > > This also fixes a race condition where the DSA layer assumes that the > bridge code already set the unbridged port's STP state to Disabled > before restoring the Forwarding state. > > As a consequence, this also fixes the FDB flush for the unbridged port > which now correctly occurs during the Forwarding to Disabled transition. > > Fixes: 0bc05d585d38 ("switchdev: allow caller to explicitly request attr_set as deferred") > Reported-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> > Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> This patch doesn't apply to -net, only applies to net-next... How should I handle that, do I resend a patch for net-next with the good subject prefix, and a v2 for -net? Sorry for the noise, Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists