[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0UcKFEB6oPXtVQsQK0qSCRNRhxs4juvcMHh_1x8bRCPaXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 15:25:06 -0700
From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 09/14] ip6_tun: Add infrastructure for doing encapsulation
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com> wrote:
> Add encap_hlen and ip_tunnel_encap structure to ip6_tnl. Add functions
> for getting encap hlen, setting up encap on a tunnel, performing
> encapsulation operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
> ---
> include/net/ip6_tunnel.h | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/ipv4/ip_tunnel_core.c | 5 +++
> net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 3 files changed, 139 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
So it looks like you completely dropped the two spots that were
updating mtu and max_headroom with the t->hlen. I thought you needed
to at least have a check that used t->encap_hlen here in order to
avoid overflowing the buffer or exceeding skb_headroom, or am I
missing something?
- Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists