[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160516.140415.1976709754133870798.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 14:04:15 -0400 (EDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: f.fainelli@...il.com
Cc: u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...gutronix.de, afd@...com,
nm@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phy: add support for a reset-gpio specification
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 10:29:44 -0700
> On 05/16/2016 10:23 AM, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>> Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:00:33 +0200
>>
>>> The framework only asserts (for now) that the reset gpio is not active.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>>
>> Applied.
>
> Humm that was a little too quick IMHO, there are two concurrent patches
> adressing the same problem right now, and Uwe's patch relies on a
> specific "quirk" of specifying the Ethernet PHY's full OUI in the Device
> Tree compatible string, while Sergei's approach does not require that...
> AFAICT, the binding portion of the patch was also still being discussed.
>
> I guess we will have to submit incremental patches now.
Sorry, I thought this one had been resolved. :-/
There is still a lot of time to correct this, don't worry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists