[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1463607599.2713.70.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2016 14:39:59 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Raanan Avargil <raanan.avargil@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net] e1000e: keep vlan interfaces functional after
rxvlan off
On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 15:03 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> I've got a bug report about an e1000e interface, where a vlan interface
> is
> set up on top of it:
>
> $ ip link add link ens1f0 name ens1f0.99 type vlan id 99
> $ ip link set ens1f0 up
> $ ip link set ens1f0.99 up
> $ ip addr add 192.168.99.92 dev ens1f0.99
>
> At this point, I can ping another host on vlan 99, ip 192.168.99.91.
> However, if I do the following:
>
> $ ethtool -K ens1f0 rxvlan off
>
> Then no traffic passes on ens1f0.99. It comes back if I toggle rxvlan on
> again. I'm not sure if this is actually intended behavior, or if there's
> a
> lack of software vlan stripping fallback, or what, but things continue to
> work if I simply don't call e1000e_vlan_strip_disable() if there are
> active vlans (plagiarizing a function from the e1000 driver here) on the
> interface.
>
> Also slipped a related-ish fix to the kerneldoc text for
> e1000e_vlan_strip_disable here...
>
> CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> CC: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Raanan, please review this patch. Even though it is an RFC I will be
adding it to my queue for testing.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/623238/
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists