[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160519.111208.1949769629804288508.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 11:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: eric.dumazet@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, aduyck@...antis.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] net: remove busylock
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 10:08:36 -0700
> busylock was added at the time we had expensive ticket spinlocks
>
> (commit 79640a4ca6955e3ebdb7038508fa7a0cd7fa5527 ("net: add additional
> lock to qdisc to increase throughput")
>
> Now kernel spinlocks are MCS, this busylock things is no longer
> relevant. It is slowing down things a bit.
...
> That would be a 8 % increase.
Presumably only for x86-64 and other platforms that actually are using
the ticket spinlocks.
For others it would be a regression.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists