lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 19:41:48 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: kvalo@...eaurora.org Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull-request: wireless-drivers-next 2016-05-13 (take two) From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 15:45:08 +0300 > this the second version of the last pull request to net-next for 4.7, > which got postponed due to the recent iwlwifi merge conflict. Now that > Linus fixed the merge problem in his tree I actually didn't have to fix > anything in my tree anymore. So that's why I still use the same tag as > in my previous pull request. > > The only dependency is that you need Linus' iwlwifi fix in your tree > before you pull this: > > 0e034f5c4bc4 iwlwifi: fix mis-merge that breaks the driver > > So if you could pull latest Linus' tree to net-next that would solve > that. I just did a test merge of that on your net-next tree and didn't > see any conflicts, so this pull should go smoothly. Also these patches > have been in linux-next at least a week now. But please let me know if > you see any issues. Done, pulled, thanks a lot! > And I think a lesson learned from this is that I need to immediately > merge wireless-drivers to wireless-drivers-next if there are any > conflicts between the trees. Or how do you suggest to handle cases like > that? You shouldn't have to worry about this kind of stuff at all, and let's just hope I handle the conflict better next time. :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists