lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <34EFBCA9F01B0748BEB6B629CE643AE60AFE2A87@szxeml561-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 May 2016 06:26:34 +0000
From:	wangyunjian <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
To:	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	Liuyongan <liuyongan@...wei.com>
Subject: 答复: [PATCH] virtio_net: fix virtnet_open and virtnet_probe competing for try_fill_recv

Jason Wang,

	Thanks for your comments.

	I make new patch, according to your comments.
	

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Jason Wang [mailto:jasowang@...hat.com] 
发送时间: 2016年5月26日 9:41
收件人: wangyunjian; davem@...emloft.net; netdev@...r.kernel.org; mst@...hat.com; Liuyongan
主题: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: fix virtnet_open and virtnet_probe competing for try_fill_recv



On 2016年05月25日 20:33, wangyunjian wrote:
> In function virtnet_open() and virtnet_probe(), func try_fill_recv() will be executed at the same time. VQ in virtqueue_add() is not protected well and BUG_ON will be triggered when virito_net.ko being removed.
>
> Test Script:
> for (( i=0; i<5000000; i=i+1 )); do
> 	rmmod virtio_net
> 	modprobe virtio_net
> 	ifconfig eth0 up
> done
>
> [  302.336996] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [  302.338794] 
> kernel BUG at virtio_ring.c:750!
> [  302.340013] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP [  302.340013] last sysfs 
> file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:03.0/virtio0/device
> [  302.340013] CPU 0
> [  302.340013] Modules linked in: virtio_balloon virtio_net(-) 
> virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio ipv6 af_packet microcode acpiphp 
> pci_hotplug fuse loop dm_mod rtc_cmos tpm_tis rtc_core tpm i2c_piix4 
> rtc_lib container button floppy pcspkr tpm_bios i2c_core joydev sg 
> usbhid hid uhci_hcd ehci_hcd usbcore edd ext3 mbcache jbd fan 
> processor ide_pci_generic piix ide_core ata_generic at a_piix libata 
> thermal thermal_sys hwmon sd_mod crc_t10dif kvm_ivshmem(N) scsi_mod 
> pv_channel(N) [last unloaded: virtio] [  302.340013] Supported: Yes [  
> 302.340013] Pid: 8410, comm: rmmod Tainted: GN  2.6.32.12-0.7-default 
> #1 Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) [  302.340013] RIP: 
> 0010:[<ffffffffa0323419>]  [<ffffffffa0323419>] 
> virtqueue_detach_unused_buf+0xb9/0xc0 [virtio_ring] [  302.340013] 
> RSP: 0018:ffff88000c7a9e08  EFLAGS: 00010283 [  302.340013] RAX: 
> 00000000000000f4 RBX: 0000000000000100 RCX: 0000000000004d8e [  
> 302.340013] RDX: ffff880001e00000 RSI: 0000000000000046 RDI: 
> ffffffff81a71570 [  302.340013] RBP: ffff88000c987000 R08: 
> 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000000a [  302.340013] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000400 [  302.340013] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fff92bc1758 R15: 0000000000000001 [  302.340013] FS:  00007f8b3995d700(0000) GS:ffff880001e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [  302.340013] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b [  302.340013] CR2: 00007fff196433e0 CR3: 000000000d07e000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 [  302.340013] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [  302.340013] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [  302.340013] Process rmmod (pid: 8410, threadinfo ffff88000c7a8000, task ffff88000c7aa200) [  302.340013] Stack:
> [  302.340013]  ffff88000fbb3780 0000000000000000 ffff88000c987000 
> ffffffffa034b178 [  302.340013] <0> ffff88000fbb3850 ffff88000fbb3780 
> ffffffffa034efc0 ffff88000fbb3850 [  302.340013] <0> 0000000000000000 
> ffffffffa034b299 ffff88000fbb3780 ffffffffa034b406 [  302.340013] Call Trace:
> [  302.340013]  [<ffffffffa034b178>] free_unused_bufs+0x88/0x120 
> [virtio_net] [  302.340013]  [<ffffffffa034b299>] 
> remove_vq_common+0x19/0x30 [virtio_net] [  302.340013]  
> [<ffffffffa034b406>] virtnet_remove+0x46/0x80 [virtio_net] [  
> 302.340013]  [<ffffffffa0219245>] virtio_dev_remove+0x15/0x60 [virtio] 
> [  302.340013]  [<ffffffff81294551>] 
> __device_release_driver+0x91/0x110
> [  302.340013]  [<ffffffff81294678>] driver_detach+0xa8/0xb0 [  
> 302.340013]  [<ffffffff81293562>] bus_remove_driver+0x82/0x110 [  
> 302.340013]  [<ffffffff8107aea4>] sys_delete_module+0x1c4/0x290 [  
> 302.340013]  [<ffffffff81002f7b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b [  
> 302.340013]  [<00007f8b394c7de7>] 0x7f8b394c7de7 [  302.340013] Code: 
> c3 01 49 83 c4 04 e8 30 10 07 e1 8b 55 38 39 da 77 d0 8b 75 2c 31 c0 
> 48 c7 c7 ba 4b 32 a0 e8 18 10 07 e1 8b 45 2c 3b 45 38 74 82 <0f> 0b eb 
> fe 0f 1f 00 48 83 ec 28 48 89 6c 24 08 48 89 1c 24 48 [  302.340013] 
> RIP  [<ffffffffa0323419>] virtqueue_detach_unused_buf+0xb9/0xc0 
> [virtio_ring] [  302.340013]  RSP <ffff88000c7a9e08> [  302.438579] 
> ---[ end trace 1e583bdb5b2644f1 ]---
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunjian Wang <wangyunjian@...wei.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 4 ----
>   1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c index 
> 49d84e5..4528ef8 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -818,10 +818,6 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_device *dev)
>          int i;
>
>          for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> -               if (i < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> -                       /* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
> -                       if (!try_fill_recv(vi, &vi->rq[i], GFP_KERNEL))
> -                               schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>                  virtnet_napi_enable(&vi->rq[i]);
>          }
>
> --
> 1.7.12.4
>

Thanks a lot for spotting the issue.

But the fix looks questionable, what if we increase the number of queues before we open it? I can thin two solutions:

- since ndo_open() is protected by rtnl_lock, how about protect the refill in virtnet_probe() with rtnl_lock?
- or looks like we can remove the refills in virtnet_probe() since we will do it in .ndo_open() ?

Btw, we usually use net or net-next prefix in the patch. For the patch like this, it should have something like "PATCH net" as a prefix. And since it needs go to -stable, better add a short descriptor after "---" 
for letting David to know about this.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ