| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5748174A.4080309@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 11:45:46 +0200
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@....samsung.com>
To: Alexander Aring <aar@...gutronix.de>, linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de, marcel@...tmann.org,
jukka.rissanen@...ux.intel.com, hannes@...essinduktion.org,
mcr@...delman.ca, werner@...esberger.net,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC 07/12] addrconf: put prefix address add in an own function
Hello.
On 23/05/16 21:22, Alexander Aring wrote:
> This patch moves the functionality to add a RA PIO prefix generated
> address in an own function. This move prepares to add a hook for
> adding a second address for a second link-layer address. E.g. short
> address for 802.15.4 6LoWPAN.
>
> Cc: David S. Miller<davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov<kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>
> Cc: James Morris<jmorris@...ei.org>
> Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
> Cc: Patrick McHardy<kaber@...sh.net>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring<aar@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 191 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> index beaad49..393cdbf 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
> @@ -2333,6 +2333,104 @@ static bool is_addr_mode_generate_stable(struct inet6_dev *idev)
> idev->addr_gen_mode == IN6_ADDR_GEN_MODE_RANDOM;
> }
>
> +static void addrconf_prefix_rcv_add_addr(struct net *net,
> + struct net_device *dev,
> + const struct prefix_info *pinfo,
> + struct inet6_dev *in6_dev,
> + const struct in6_addr *addr,
> + int addr_type, u32 addr_flags,
> + bool sllao, bool tokenized,
> + __u32 valid_lft, u32 prefered_lft)
> +{
> + struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp = ipv6_get_ifaddr(net, addr, dev, 1);
> + int create = 0, update_lft = 0;
> +
> + if (!ifp && valid_lft) {
> + int max_addresses = in6_dev->cnf.max_addresses;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD
> + if (in6_dev->cnf.optimistic_dad &&
> + !net->ipv6.devconf_all->forwarding && sllao)
> + addr_flags |= IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC;
> +#endif
> +
> + /* Do not allow to create too much of autoconfigured
> + * addresses; this would be too easy way to crash kernel.
> + */
> + if (!max_addresses ||
> + ipv6_count_addresses(in6_dev) < max_addresses)
> + ifp = ipv6_add_addr(in6_dev, addr, NULL,
> + pinfo->prefix_len,
> + addr_type&IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_MASK,
> + addr_flags, valid_lft,
> + prefered_lft);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ifp)) {
> + in6_dev_put(in6_dev);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + update_lft = 0;
> + create = 1;
> + spin_lock_bh(&ifp->lock);
> + ifp->flags |= IFA_F_MANAGETEMPADDR;
> + ifp->cstamp = jiffies;
> + ifp->tokenized = tokenized;
> + spin_unlock_bh(&ifp->lock);
> + addrconf_dad_start(ifp);
> + }
> +
> + if (ifp) {
> + u32 flags;
> + unsigned long now;
> + u32 stored_lft;
> +
> + /* update lifetime (RFC2462 5.5.3 e) */
> + spin_lock_bh(&ifp->lock);
> + now = jiffies;
> + if (ifp->valid_lft > (now - ifp->tstamp) / HZ)
> + stored_lft = ifp->valid_lft - (now - ifp->tstamp) / HZ;
> + else
> + stored_lft = 0;
> + if (!update_lft && !create && stored_lft) {
> + const u32 minimum_lft = min_t(u32,
> + stored_lft, MIN_VALID_LIFETIME);
> + valid_lft = max(valid_lft, minimum_lft);
> +
> + /* RFC4862 Section 5.5.3e:
> + * "Note that the preferred lifetime of the
> + * corresponding address is always reset to
> + * the Preferred Lifetime in the received
> + * Prefix Information option, regardless of
> + * whether the valid lifetime is also reset or
> + * ignored."
> + *
> + * So we should always update prefered_lft here.
> + */
> + update_lft = 1;
> + }
> +
> + if (update_lft) {
> + ifp->valid_lft = valid_lft;
> + ifp->prefered_lft = prefered_lft;
> + ifp->tstamp = now;
> + flags = ifp->flags;
> + ifp->flags &= ~IFA_F_DEPRECATED;
> + spin_unlock_bh(&ifp->lock);
> +
> + if (!(flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE))
> + ipv6_ifa_notify(0, ifp);
> + } else
> + spin_unlock_bh(&ifp->lock);
> +
> + manage_tempaddrs(in6_dev, ifp, valid_lft, prefered_lft,
> + create, now);
> +
> + in6_ifa_put(ifp);
> + addrconf_verify();
> + }
> +}
> +
> void addrconf_prefix_rcv(struct net_device *dev, u8 *opt, int len, bool sllao)
> {
> struct prefix_info *pinfo;
> @@ -2432,9 +2530,7 @@ void addrconf_prefix_rcv(struct net_device *dev, u8 *opt, int len, bool sllao)
> /* Try to figure out our local address for this prefix */
>
> if (pinfo->autoconf && in6_dev->cnf.autoconf) {
> - struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp;
> struct in6_addr addr;
> - int create = 0, update_lft = 0;
> bool tokenized = false;
>
> if (pinfo->prefix_len == 64) {
> @@ -2464,93 +2560,10 @@ void addrconf_prefix_rcv(struct net_device *dev, u8 *opt, int len, bool sllao)
> return;
>
> ok:
> -
> - ifp = ipv6_get_ifaddr(net, &addr, dev, 1);
> -
> - if (!ifp && valid_lft) {
> - int max_addresses = in6_dev->cnf.max_addresses;
> -
> -#ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_OPTIMISTIC_DAD
> - if (in6_dev->cnf.optimistic_dad &&
> - !net->ipv6.devconf_all->forwarding && sllao)
> - addr_flags |= IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC;
> -#endif
> -
> - /* Do not allow to create too much of autoconfigured
> - * addresses; this would be too easy way to crash kernel.
> - */
> - if (!max_addresses ||
> - ipv6_count_addresses(in6_dev) < max_addresses)
> - ifp = ipv6_add_addr(in6_dev, &addr, NULL,
> - pinfo->prefix_len,
> - addr_type&IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_MASK,
> - addr_flags, valid_lft,
> - prefered_lft);
> -
> - if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ifp)) {
> - in6_dev_put(in6_dev);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - update_lft = 0;
> - create = 1;
> - spin_lock_bh(&ifp->lock);
> - ifp->flags |= IFA_F_MANAGETEMPADDR;
> - ifp->cstamp = jiffies;
> - ifp->tokenized = tokenized;
> - spin_unlock_bh(&ifp->lock);
> - addrconf_dad_start(ifp);
> - }
> -
> - if (ifp) {
> - u32 flags;
> - unsigned long now;
> - u32 stored_lft;
> -
> - /* update lifetime (RFC2462 5.5.3 e) */
> - spin_lock_bh(&ifp->lock);
> - now = jiffies;
> - if (ifp->valid_lft > (now - ifp->tstamp) / HZ)
> - stored_lft = ifp->valid_lft - (now - ifp->tstamp) / HZ;
> - else
> - stored_lft = 0;
> - if (!update_lft && !create && stored_lft) {
> - const u32 minimum_lft = min_t(u32,
> - stored_lft, MIN_VALID_LIFETIME);
> - valid_lft = max(valid_lft, minimum_lft);
> -
> - /* RFC4862 Section 5.5.3e:
> - * "Note that the preferred lifetime of the
> - * corresponding address is always reset to
> - * the Preferred Lifetime in the received
> - * Prefix Information option, regardless of
> - * whether the valid lifetime is also reset or
> - * ignored."
> - *
> - * So we should always update prefered_lft here.
> - */
> - update_lft = 1;
> - }
> -
> - if (update_lft) {
> - ifp->valid_lft = valid_lft;
> - ifp->prefered_lft = prefered_lft;
> - ifp->tstamp = now;
> - flags = ifp->flags;
> - ifp->flags &= ~IFA_F_DEPRECATED;
> - spin_unlock_bh(&ifp->lock);
> -
> - if (!(flags&IFA_F_TENTATIVE))
> - ipv6_ifa_notify(0, ifp);
> - } else
> - spin_unlock_bh(&ifp->lock);
> -
> - manage_tempaddrs(in6_dev, ifp, valid_lft, prefered_lft,
> - create, now);
> -
> - in6_ifa_put(ifp);
> - addrconf_verify();
> - }
> + addrconf_prefix_rcv_add_addr(net, dev, pinfo, in6_dev, &addr,
> + addr_type, addr_flags, sllao,
> + tokenized, valid_lft,
> + prefered_lft);
> }
> inet6_prefix_notify(RTM_NEWPREFIX, in6_dev, pinfo);
> in6_dev_put(in6_dev);
Reviewed-by: Stefan Schmidt<stefan@....samsung.com>
regards
Stefan Schmidt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists