netdev - Re: ath9k gpio request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <574D3EAA.3060102@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 May 2016 13:05:06 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	QCA ath9k Development <ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Miaoqing Pan <miaoqing@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: ath9k gpio request

On Tuesday 31 May 2016 01:01 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> (Changing subject to a more descriptive one, was "Re: linux-next: Tree
> for May 30")
>
> Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> writes:
>
>> Hi All,
>> I have just built and booted with next-20160530 and my dmesg is full
>> of warnings from ath9k. Last kernel tested was v4.6 and there was no
>> problem with that.
>>

<snip>


> The traces look incomplete to me, is there anything more before the
> "Call Trace:" line? Full unedited logs are usually the best.

sure, its attached. those two warnings are recursively going on and 
there is nothing else left in dmesg to see what started it.

Regards
Sudip

View attachment "dmesg.txt" of type "text/plain" (220458 bytes)