lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160601220114.GC24671@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:01:16 -0700
From:	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:	Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
	dinan.gunawardena@...ronome.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 12/12] nfp: bpf: add denser mode of execution

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 05:50:14PM +0100, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> If BPF uses less than 7 registers programmable engines
> can process twice as many packets in parallel.  Signal
> this denser mode of operation to FW by setting the lowest
> bit in DMA address of the machine code buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dinan Gunawardena <dgunawardena@...ronome.com>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>

wow. that sounds pretty cool.
I was about to ask whether we can help HW to be more efficient
by doing something on bpf side like annotating the registers or
adding 'hw_only' registers...
but looks like less registers is actually good, since NFP jit
can parallelize it? Truly wow.
if you can share the hw architecture details and explain more
on how this 'dense_mode' works, would be awesome.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ