| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:15:20 -0700
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stasn77@...il.com, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: [Patch net] act_police: fix a crash during removal
The police action is using its own code to initialize tcf hash
info, which makes us to forgot to initialize a->hinfo correctly.
Fix this by calling the helper function tcf_hash_create() directly.
This patch fixed the following crash:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000028
IP: [<ffffffff810c099f>] __lock_acquire+0xd3/0xf91
PGD d3c34067 PUD d3e18067 PMD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 2 PID: 853 Comm: tc Not tainted 4.6.0+ #87
Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011
task: ffff8800d3e28040 ti: ffff8800d3f6c000 task.ti: ffff8800d3f6c000
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810c099f>] [<ffffffff810c099f>] __lock_acquire+0xd3/0xf91
RSP: 0000:ffff88011b203c80 EFLAGS: 00010002
RAX: 0000000000000046 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000028
RBP: ffff88011b203d40 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: ffff88011b203d58 R11: ffff88011b208000 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: ffff8800d3e28040 R14: 0000000000000028 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88011b200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000000000028 CR3: 00000000d4be1000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
Stack:
ffff8800d3e289c0 0000000000000046 000000001b203d60 ffffffff00000000
0000000000000000 ffff880000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000000
ffffffff8187142c ffff88011b203ce8 ffff88011b203ce8 ffffffff8101dbfc
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
[<ffffffff8187142c>] ? __tcf_hash_release+0x77/0xd1
[<ffffffff8101dbfc>] ? native_sched_clock+0x1a/0x35
[<ffffffff8101dbfc>] ? native_sched_clock+0x1a/0x35
[<ffffffff810a9604>] ? sched_clock_local+0x11/0x78
[<ffffffff810bf6a1>] ? mark_lock+0x24/0x201
[<ffffffff810c1dbd>] lock_acquire+0x120/0x1b4
[<ffffffff810c1dbd>] ? lock_acquire+0x120/0x1b4
[<ffffffff8187142c>] ? __tcf_hash_release+0x77/0xd1
[<ffffffff81aad89f>] _raw_spin_lock_bh+0x3c/0x72
[<ffffffff8187142c>] ? __tcf_hash_release+0x77/0xd1
[<ffffffff8187142c>] __tcf_hash_release+0x77/0xd1
[<ffffffff81871a27>] tcf_action_destroy+0x49/0x7c
[<ffffffff81870b1c>] tcf_exts_destroy+0x20/0x2d
[<ffffffff8189273b>] u32_destroy_key+0x1b/0x4d
[<ffffffff81892788>] u32_delete_key_freepf_rcu+0x1b/0x1d
[<ffffffff810de3b8>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x610/0x82e
[<ffffffff8189276d>] ? u32_destroy_key+0x4d/0x4d
[<ffffffff81ab0bc1>] __do_softirq+0x191/0x3f4
Fixes: ddf97ccdd7cb ("net_sched: add network namespace support for tc actions")
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
---
net/sched/act_police.c | 31 ++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/act_police.c b/net/sched/act_police.c
index b884dae..e2a38c2 100644
--- a/net/sched/act_police.c
+++ b/net/sched/act_police.c
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct tcf_police {
bool peak_present;
};
#define to_police(pc) \
- container_of(pc, struct tcf_police, common)
+ container_of(pc->priv, struct tcf_police, common)
#define POL_TAB_MASK 15
@@ -119,14 +119,12 @@ static int tcf_act_police_locate(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
struct nlattr *est, struct tc_action *a,
int ovr, int bind)
{
- unsigned int h;
int ret = 0, err;
struct nlattr *tb[TCA_POLICE_MAX + 1];
struct tc_police *parm;
struct tcf_police *police;
struct qdisc_rate_table *R_tab = NULL, *P_tab = NULL;
struct tc_action_net *tn = net_generic(net, police_net_id);
- struct tcf_hashinfo *hinfo = tn->hinfo;
int size;
if (nla == NULL)
@@ -145,7 +143,7 @@ static int tcf_act_police_locate(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
if (parm->index) {
if (tcf_hash_search(tn, a, parm->index)) {
- police = to_police(a->priv);
+ police = to_police(a);
if (bind) {
police->tcf_bindcnt += 1;
police->tcf_refcnt += 1;
@@ -156,16 +154,14 @@ static int tcf_act_police_locate(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
/* not replacing */
return -EEXIST;
}
+ } else {
+ ret = tcf_hash_create(tn, parm->index, NULL, a,
+ sizeof(*police), bind, false);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ ret = ACT_P_CREATED;
}
- police = kzalloc(sizeof(*police), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (police == NULL)
- return -ENOMEM;
- ret = ACT_P_CREATED;
- police->tcf_refcnt = 1;
- spin_lock_init(&police->tcf_lock);
- if (bind)
- police->tcf_bindcnt = 1;
override:
if (parm->rate.rate) {
err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -181,6 +177,7 @@ static int tcf_act_police_locate(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
}
}
+ police = to_police(a);
spin_lock_bh(&police->tcf_lock);
if (est) {
err = gen_replace_estimator(&police->tcf_bstats, NULL,
@@ -237,16 +234,8 @@ static int tcf_act_police_locate(struct net *net, struct nlattr *nla,
return ret;
police->tcfp_t_c = ktime_get_ns();
- police->tcf_index = parm->index ? parm->index :
- tcf_hash_new_index(tn);
- police->tcf_tm.install = jiffies;
- police->tcf_tm.lastuse = jiffies;
- h = tcf_hash(police->tcf_index, POL_TAB_MASK);
- spin_lock_bh(&hinfo->lock);
- hlist_add_head(&police->tcf_head, &hinfo->htab[h]);
- spin_unlock_bh(&hinfo->lock);
+ tcf_hash_insert(tn, a);
- a->priv = police;
return ret;
failure_unlock:
--
2.1.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists