[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGRGNgUZ+mG_KzhiOzquB3qd-V_Pdbazag=nrFpG87mRQGmXLg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 14:20:55 +1000
From: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Xinming Hu <huxm@...vell.com>,
Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@...vell.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] mwifiex: don't print an error if an optional DT
property is missing
Hi All,
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:18 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
<javier@....samsung.com> wrote:
> The Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/marvell-sd8xxx.txt DT
> binding document say that the "interrupts" property in the child node is
> optional. So the property being missed shouldn't be treated as an error.
Have you checked whether it is truly optional? I.e. nothing else
breaks if this property isn't set?
> Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Other than that, this looks sensible to me.
Reviewed-by: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sdio.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Thanks,
--
Julian Calaby
Email: julian.calaby@...il.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists