[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160601011148.GD31982@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 03:11:48 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Iyappan Subramanian <isubramanian@....com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
patches@....com, matthias.bgg@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] drivers: net: phy: Add MDIO driver
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 05:10:38PM -0700, Iyappan Subramanian wrote:
> +static int xgene_mdio_reset(struct xgene_mdio_pdata *pdata)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (pdata->mdio_id == XGENE_MDIO_RGMII) {
> + if (pdata->dev->of_node) {
> + clk_prepare_enable(pdata->clk);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(pdata->clk);
> + clk_prepare_enable(pdata->clk);
Hi Iyappan
Is that a workaround for a hardware problem? If so, i would suggest
adding a comment, to stop people submitting a patch simplifying it.
> +static int xgene_mdio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct mii_bus *mdio_bus;
> + const struct of_device_id *of_id;
> + struct resource *res;
> + struct xgene_mdio_pdata *pdata;
> + void __iomem *csr_addr;
> + int mdio_id = 0, ret = 0;
> +
> + of_id = of_match_device(xgene_mdio_of_match, &pdev->dev);
> + if (mdio_id == XGENE_MDIO_RGMII) {
> + mdio_bus->read = xgene_mdio_rgmii_read;
> + mdio_bus->write = xgene_mdio_rgmii_write;
> + } else {
> + mdio_bus->read = xgene_xfi_mdio_read;
> + mdio_bus->write = xgene_xfi_mdio_write;
> + }
> +static const struct of_device_id xgene_mdio_of_match[] = {
> + {
> + .compatible = "apm,xgene-mdio-rgmii",
> + .data = (void *)XGENE_MDIO_RGMII
> + },
> + {
> + .compatible = "apm,xgene-mdio-xfi",
> + .data = (void *)XGENE_MDIO_XFI},
> + {},
> +};
This all makes me think you should have two separate MDIO drivers, one
for each compatible string. There is not that much shared code.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists