netdev - Re: ath9k gpio request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57501AE4.7080104@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 02 Jun 2016 17:09:16 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	"Pan, Miaoqing" <miaoqing@....qualcomm.com>,
	Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	ath9k-devel <ath9k-devel@....qualcomm.com>,
	"linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	"ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org" <ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Miaoqing Pan <miaoqing@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: ath9k gpio request

On Thursday 02 June 2016 01:32 PM, Pan, Miaoqing wrote:
> Seems there are something wrong in the datasheet,  try
>
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/reg.h
> @@ -1122,8 +1122,8 @@ enum {
>   #define AR9300_NUM_GPIO                          16
>   #define AR9330_NUM_GPIO                                 16
>   #define AR9340_NUM_GPIO                                 23
> -#define AR9462_NUM_GPIO                                 10
> -#define AR9485_NUM_GPIO                                 12
> +#define AR9462_NUM_GPIO                                 14
> +#define AR9485_NUM_GPIO                                 11
>   #define AR9531_NUM_GPIO                                 18
>   #define AR9550_NUM_GPIO                                 24
>   #define AR9561_NUM_GPIO                                 23
> @@ -1139,8 +1139,8 @@ enum {
>   #define AR9300_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000F4FF
>   #define AR9330_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000F4FF
>   #define AR9340_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F
> -#define AR9462_GPIO_MASK                        0x000003FF
> -#define AR9485_GPIO_MASK                        0x00000FFF
> +#define AR9462_GPIO_MASK                        0x00003FFF
> +#define AR9485_GPIO_MASK                        0x000007FF
>   #define AR9531_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F
>   #define AR9550_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F
>   #define AR9561_GPIO_MASK                        0x0000000F

solves the problem.

Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>

Regards
Sudip