[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5751B4BB.5060005@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 19:47:55 +0300
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>,
<mugunthanvnm@...com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: remove unused priv lock
On 06/03/2016 01:37 AM, Ivan Khoronzhuk wrote:
> There is no reason in this lock. At least for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@...aro.org>
> ---
>
> Based on master
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index 9919cb3..8d1d373 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> @@ -365,7 +365,6 @@ static inline void slave_write(struct cpsw_slave *slave, u32 val, u32 offset)
> }
>
> struct cpsw_priv {
> - spinlock_t lock;
> struct platform_device *pdev;
> struct net_device *ndev;
> struct napi_struct napi_rx;
> @@ -2413,7 +2412,6 @@ static int cpsw_probe_dual_emac(struct platform_device *pdev,
> }
>
> priv_sl2 = netdev_priv(ndev);
> - spin_lock_init(&priv_sl2->lock);
> priv_sl2->data = *data;
> priv_sl2->pdev = pdev;
> priv_sl2->ndev = ndev;
> @@ -2533,7 +2531,6 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ndev);
> priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> - spin_lock_init(&priv->lock);
> priv->pdev = pdev;
> priv->ndev = ndev;
> priv->dev = &ndev->dev;
>
Reviewed-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
--
regards,
-grygorii
Powered by blists - more mailing lists