lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57515004.1080301@huawei.com>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:38:12 +0800
From:	Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>
To:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: [bug discuss] fjes driver call trace warning, "PNP0C02" used in fjes
 seems like a bug,

Hi all:

The bug is recorded in https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2292.

"PNP0C02" attached two modules drivers/pnp/system.c and drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c .
"fjes" driver lead to the call trace.

system.c:
static const struct pnp_device_id pnp_dev_table[] = {
         /* General ID for reserving resources */
         {"PNP0c02", 0},
         /* memory controller */
         {"PNP0c01", 0},
         {"", 0}
};

jes_main.c:
static const struct acpi_device_id fjes_acpi_ids[] = {
         {"PNP0C02", 0},
         {"", 0},
};

Both of the modules use id "PNP0C02" (case insensitive),

I used "PNP0C02" to mark motherboard reserved resource as below in UEFI.
Device (RES1)
{
	Name (_HID, "HISI0081") // HiSi PCIe RC config baseaddress
	Name (_CID, "PNP0C02") // Motherboard reserved resource
		Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate (){
			Memory32Fixed (ReadWrite, 0xb0080000 , 0x10000)
		})
}

I think that "PNP0C02" should be used to mark any motherboard reserved resource and not a specific network driver.
It seems like a bug in the "fjes" driver.

Thanks

Dongdong




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ