[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57515004.1080301@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:38:12 +0800
From: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>
To: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: [bug discuss] fjes driver call trace warning, "PNP0C02" used in fjes
seems like a bug,
Hi all:
The bug is recorded in https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2292.
"PNP0C02" attached two modules drivers/pnp/system.c and drivers/net/fjes/fjes_main.c .
"fjes" driver lead to the call trace.
system.c:
static const struct pnp_device_id pnp_dev_table[] = {
/* General ID for reserving resources */
{"PNP0c02", 0},
/* memory controller */
{"PNP0c01", 0},
{"", 0}
};
jes_main.c:
static const struct acpi_device_id fjes_acpi_ids[] = {
{"PNP0C02", 0},
{"", 0},
};
Both of the modules use id "PNP0C02" (case insensitive),
I used "PNP0C02" to mark motherboard reserved resource as below in UEFI.
Device (RES1)
{
Name (_HID, "HISI0081") // HiSi PCIe RC config baseaddress
Name (_CID, "PNP0C02") // Motherboard reserved resource
Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate (){
Memory32Fixed (ReadWrite, 0xb0080000 , 0x10000)
})
}
I think that "PNP0C02" should be used to mark any motherboard reserved resource and not a specific network driver.
It seems like a bug in the "fjes" driver.
Thanks
Dongdong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists