[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160604200016.GD2063@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 22:00:16 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, john@...ozen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/9] net: dsa: Add support for parsing the old
binding
> -static int dsa_cpu_parse(struct device_node *port, u32 index,
> - struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
> - struct dsa_switch *ds)
> +static int _dsa_cpu_parse(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
> + struct dsa_switch *ds,
> + struct net_device *ethernet_dev,
> + u32 index)
> {
> - struct net_device *ethernet_dev;
> - struct device_node *ethernet;
> -
> - ethernet = of_parse_phandle(port, "ethernet", 0);
> - if (!ethernet)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - ethernet_dev = of_find_net_device_by_node(ethernet);
> - if (!ethernet_dev)
> - return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> -
Hi Florian
You have just removed all the actual DT parsing. So i would give this
a different name, and avoid the _ prefix.
> +static int _dsa_register_switch_legacy(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct device_node *np)
> +{
We might want to call this _dsa_register_switch_legacy_sf2, since the
code only supports what is needed for your rather odd sf2 binding. It
does not appear to work for the generic DSA binding.
> static int __dsa_register_switch(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct device_node *np)
> {
> struct device_node *ports = dsa_get_ports(ds, np);
> @@ -626,8 +736,8 @@ static int _dsa_register_switch(struct dsa_switch *ds, struct device_node *np)
> {
> struct device_node *ports = dsa_get_ports(ds, np);
>
> - if (IS_ERR(ports))
> - return PTR_ERR(ports);
> + if (IS_ERR(ports) && PTR_ERR(ports) == -EINVAL)
> + return _dsa_register_switch_legacy(ds, np);
Maybe put this inside if config_enabled(CONFIG_NET_DSA_BCM_SF2) {}?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists