[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1465069232.2968.14.camel@edumazet-glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 12:40:32 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stas Nichiporovich <stasn77@...il.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [net] fq_codel: fix NET_XMIT_CN behavior
On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 21:03 +0200, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Is skb still valid here? AFAICS its possible that fq_codel_drop() drops it.
>
> Other than that this looks good, thanks Eric!
You are are right. skb is guaranteed to be valid only when we return
NET_XMIT_SUCCESS.
I'll send a V2, thanks !
Powered by blists - more mailing lists