lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:11:25 +0200 From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> To: Z Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com> CC: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper On 06/06/2016 06:56 AM, Z Lim wrote: [...] > How about the attached patch? Fixes compilation error on build > !CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL. > > Also, should this patch be sent to net or net-next (along with this series)? Looks good, feel free to add: Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net> I think net-next along with your series should be fine since the issue first appeared there. Thanks, Zi!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists