[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160607002212.GO12165@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 02:22:12 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emlof.net,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/5] net: dsa: Initialize
ds->enabled_port_mask and ds->phys_mii_mask
> @@ -304,6 +312,18 @@ static int dsa_ds_apply(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst, struct dsa_switch *ds)
> if (err < 0)
> return err;
>
> + if (!ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->drv->phy_read) {
> + ds->slave_mii_bus = devm_mdiobus_alloc(ds->dev);
> + if (!ds->slave_mii_bus)
> + return err;
> +
> + dsa_slave_mii_bus_init(ds);
> +
> + err = mdiobus_register(ds->slave_mii_bus);
> + if (err < 0)
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> for (index = 0; index < DSA_MAX_PORTS; index++) {
> port = ds->ports[index].dn;
> if (!port)
Hi Florian
This hunk does not seem to fit in this patch.
It is also missing the unregister in dsa_ds_unapply().
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists