[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5757470F.7090304@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:13:35 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/6] net: dsa: Initialize CPU port ethtool ops
per tree
On 06/07/2016 02:51 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> +int dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_setup(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
>> + struct dsa_switch *ds)
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *master;
>> + struct ethtool_ops *cpu_ops;
>> +
>> + master = ds->dst->master_netdev;
>
> You pass in dst as a parameter, and then don't use it!
I do use it here:
memcpy(&dst->master_ethtool_ops, master->ethtool_ops,
sizeof(struct ethtool_ops));
>
>> +void dsa_cpu_port_ethtool_restore(struct dsa_switch_tree *dst,
>> + struct dsa_switch *ds)
>> +{
>> + struct net_device *master;
>> +
>> + master = ds->dst->master_netdev;
>
> Same here.
and here:
master->ethtool_ops = dst->master_orig_ethtool_ops;
I sure could simplify that and use ds->dst instead if you find it more
elegant, works for me.
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists