lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE+=0-jQo14t232RVsV2o=BmbX3T0kphAjbvaAhT3cnxzc5gqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:16:02 +0530
From:	Krishna Mohan <krishnamohany3k@...il.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fwd: Loopback properties in routing on linux kernel

HI All,
    I have a question to determine the uses of multiple loopbacks
interfaces(int loopback) in routing(quagga) on linux kernel. Please
apologise if it is a dumb question. This is what I understand, please
clarify if my understanding is correct.

1. we need them to represent a /32 ip, normally used for router-id.
2. we can measure traffic destined to that ip, via its independent
statistics per loopback interface.
3. ip unnumbered uses loopbacks to represent that ip.

my question is, is it necessary to have ifindex per loopback interface
we create? if I create kernel loopback as lo:1 (as subinterface on
default loopback in kernel) with ip assigned to it will do 1. for
getting 2 and 3 done, loopback needs to be a separate netdev. is that
correct?

Will I be having any advantage if I configure the interface as lo:1 vs
a separate netdev per loopback interface (i mean dummy netdev) to
terminate the /32 destined traffic?

Thanks in advance.
Krishna Mohan.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ