[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1465310395.29158.2.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 09:39:55 -0500
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
To: Pavel Andrianov <andrianov@...ras.ru>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org, LDV list <ldv-project@...ras.ru>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [ldv-project] [net] libertas: potential race condition
On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 13:30 +0400, Pavel Andrianov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> There is a potential race condition in
> drivers/net/wireless/libertas/libertas.ko.
> In the function lbs_hard_start_xmit(..), line 159, a socket buffer
> is
> written to priv->current_skb with a spin_lock protection.
> In the function lbs_mac_event_disconnected(..), lines 50-51, the
> field
> current_skb is cleaned. There is no protection used. The
> corresponding
> handlers are activated at the same time in lbs_start_card(..) and
> then
> may be executed simultaneously. Note, there are two structures
> lbs_netdev_ops and mesh_netdev_ops, which have the target handler
> lbs_hard_start_xmit.
> Is it a real race or I have missed something?
Yeah, it looks like it should be grabbing priv->driver_lock before
clearing priv->currenttxskb in lbs_mac_event_disconnected(). Care to
submit a patch after testing? Do you have any of that hardware?
Dan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists