[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160608.113627.1672045931655714683.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 11:36:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dsa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/2] net: vrf: Improve use of FIB rules
From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:55:38 -0700
> Currently, VRFs require 1 oif and 1 iif rule per address family per
> VRF. As the number of VRF devices increases it brings scalability
> issues with the increasing rule list. All of the VRF rules have the
> same format with the exception of the specific table id to direct the
> lookup. Since the table id is available from the oif or iif in the
> loopup, the VRF rules can be consolidated to a single rule that pulls
> the table from the VRF device.
>
> This solution still allows a user to insert their own rules for VRFs,
> including rules with additional attributes. Accordingly, it is backwards
> compatible with existing setups and allows other policy routing as
> desired.
>
> Hopefully v5 is the charm; my e-waste can is getting full.
Applied, thanks.
Remember, ewaste collection is on Mondays.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists