[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160608060443.GA19287@office.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 09:04:43 +0300
From: Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Hadar Har-Zion <hadarh@...lanox.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirva@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/sched: cls_flower: Introduce support in
SKIP SW flag
On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 08:37:40AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 16-06-05 07:11 AM, Amir Vadai wrote:
> > From: Amir Vadai <amirva@...lanox.com>
> >
> > In order to make a filter processed only by hardware, skip_sw flag
> > should be supplied. This is an addition to the already existing skip_hw
> > flag (filter will be processed by software only). If no flag is
> > specified, filter will be processed by both software and hardware.
> >
> > If only hardware offloaded filters exist, fl_classify() will return
> > without doing anything.
> >
> > A following userspace patch will be sent once kernel patch is accepted.
> >
> > Example:
> >
> > tc filter add dev enp0s9 protocol ip prio 20 parent ffff: \
> > flower \
> > ip_proto 6 \
> > indev enp0s9 \
> > skip_sw \
> > action skbedit mark 0x1234
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Amir Vadai <amirva@...lanox.com>
> > ---
>
>
>
> Looks good to me. Although we need to do the same error propagation in
> flower that Jakub just added to cls_u32.
Thanks John,
I will send a patch to return error when add to hw is failing and skip_sw
is set.
>
> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists