netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: make unexported functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fbf1d568-8be2-b8e2-2244-de5f6a13f623@codethink.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:00:54 +0100
From:	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
To:	Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>,
	linux-kernel@...ts.codethink.co.uk
Cc:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@...tstofly.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: make unexported functions static

On 09/06/16 13:47, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com> writes:
> 
>> Most of them are fixed or being handled in net-next.
>>
>> I don't know if net should diverge or if it can live with these
>> warnings...
> 
> In fact I have a series in net-next fixing a few checkpatch.pl issue. If
> you don't mind I can rebase your fix and integrate the missing static.

Ah, didn't check net-next. You are welcome to rebase.

-- 
Ben Dooks				http://www.codethink.co.uk/
Senior Engineer				Codethink - Providing Genius