lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <0231E33E-1C1A-4B32-992C-9BFC7470E7E0@cumulusnetworks.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:35:52 -0600 From: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/4] net: vrf: call netdev_lockdep_set_classes() > On Jun 8, 2016, at 10:01 PM, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:41 PM, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote: >>> On 6/8/16 9:29 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote: >>> >>> In case a qdisc is used on a vrf device, we need to use different >>> lockdep classes to avoid false positives. >>> >>> Fixes: f9eb8aea2a1e ("net_sched: transform qdisc running bit into a >>> seqcount") >>> Reported-by: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> >> >> >> same result with this patch set. > > Are you stacking multiple vrf devices ? No. You can also look at ipvlan. It shows the same trace. For me it is 3 commands that create the vrf, add eth1, run ping.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists