netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/4] net: vrf: call netdev_lockdep_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20160609.000957.1216711130886558488.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Thu, 09 Jun 2016 00:09:57 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	edumazet@...gle.com
Cc:	dsa@...ulusnetworks.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 2/4] net: vrf: call
 netdev_lockdep_set_classes()

From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 21:01:35 -0700

> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 8:41 PM, David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com> wrote:
>> On 6/8/16 9:29 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>>
>>> In case a qdisc is used on a vrf device, we need to use different
>>> lockdep classes to avoid false positives.
>>>
>>> Fixes: f9eb8aea2a1e ("net_sched: transform qdisc running bit into a
>>> seqcount")
>>> Reported-by: David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>>
>>
>> same result with this patch set.
>>
> 
> Are you stacking multiple vrf devices ?

Ok I'm holding off on this patch series until this is resolved.