[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k2hwq0h1.fsf@ketchup.mtl.sfl>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 15:59:22 -0400
From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/8] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: do not increment bus refcount
Hi,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:44:52PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
>> The MDIO device probe and remove functions are respectively incrementing
>> and decrementing the bus refcount themselves. Since these bus level
>> actions are out of the device scope, remove them.
>
> I agree with the patch. But have you checked the mdio layer is doing
> the right thing? If not, we should fix that first.
So I added some printing after incrementing/decrementing the refcount in
get_device/put_device to track &ps->bus->dev, which name is "0.1".
Regardless having this patch or not, the refcount of the 0.1 mii_bus
device is 5 before loading the mv88e6xxx module on vf610-zii-dev-rev-b.
Below is a portion of dmesg:
[ 8.921647] get_device: 400d1000.etherne refcount: 4
[ 8.926225] get_device: 0.1 refcount: 2
[ 8.929561] get_device: mdio-mux refcount: 5
[ 8.934076] get_device: 0.1 refcount: 3
[ 8.937446] get_device: 0.1 refcount: 4
[ 8.940792] put_device: 0.1 refcount: 3
[ 8.944181] libphy: mdio_mux: probed
[ 8.947885] mdio_bus 0.1:00: mdio_device_register
[ 8.952649] get_device: 0.1:00 refcount: 2
[ 8.956283] get_device: 0.1 refcount: 4
[ 8.959838] get_device: 0.1:00 refcount: 3
[ 8.963991] get_device: 0.1:00 refcount: 4
[ 8.967598] put_device: 0.1:00 refcount: 3
[ 8.971298] get_device: 0.2 refcount: 2
[ 8.974687] get_device: mdio-mux refcount: 7
So it seems like of_ is managing the bus refcount on events such as a
new child node (0.1:00).
Thanks,
Vivien
Powered by blists - more mailing lists