[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <575A788C.5020509@ispras.ru>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:21:32 +0400
From: Pavel Andrianov <andrianov@...ras.ru>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>
CC: Chaoming Li <chaoming_li@...lsil.com.cn>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Vaishali Thakkar <vaishali.thakkar@...cle.com>,
ldv-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: [ldv-project] [net] rtl8188ee: a potential race condition
Hi!
There is a potential data race in
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8188ee/rtl8188ee.ko.
In the function rtl88ee_gpio_radio_on_off_checking the flag
ppsc->rfchange_inprogress is set with a spinlock protection. In the
function rtl_ps_set_rf_state the flag is read also under a spinlock. But
the function rtl88e_dm_watchdog read it without any locks. As a result
rtl88e_dm_watchdog may execute the succeeding code while changing (with
the flag rfchange_inprogress == true). I do not exactly determine the
consequences, but likely they are not good if there exists such check.
Could anybody more confident confirm this?
The function rtl_ps_set_rf_state is always called with its parameter
[protect_or_not == false]. Is this flag really necessary, if the value
'true' is never used? The function is also set the flag
ppsc->rfchange_inprogress and may affect the rtl88e_dm_watchdog as in
the previous case.
--
Pavel Andrianov
Linux Verification Center, ISPRAS
web: http://linuxtesting.org
e-mail: andrianov@...ras.ru
Powered by blists - more mailing lists