netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: keep PHY up for WoL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bd302fc6-feae-b99a-4632-a0ff9ead0123@st.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:29:44 +0200
From:	Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
To:	Vincent Palatin <vpalatin@...omium.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: keep PHY up for WoL

Hello Vincent

On 6/10/2016 1:00 AM, Vincent Palatin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:25:38PM -0700, Vincent Palatin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 12:23 AM, Giuseppe CAVALLARO
>>> <peppe.cavallaro@...com> wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>
>>>> On 6/3/2016 7:29 PM, Vincent Palatin wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Do not shutdown the PHY if Wake-on-Lan is enabled, else it cannot wake
>>>>> us up.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I do not understand why you need that.
>>>> This is done inside the PHY layer and it is tested on our platforms
>>>> he idea is: If the parent wants to Wake the system then the PHY should
>>>> not power-down.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure I understand :
>>> you mean that this path is not called if WoL is enabled ?
>>> [ currently stmmac_pltfr_suspend() is calling priv->plat->exit() which
>>> is the rk_gmac_exit() code I'm modifying ]
>>> or the RK driver code should not power down the phy in its exit() callback ?
>>
>> Take a look at phy_suspend().
>
> phy_suspend() sends (or not) the PowerDown command to the PHY through
> the MDIO bus,  depending if WoL is disabled,
> but most of my question still stands as far as I can tell :
> I was trying to get a proper WoL support on the following setup :
>   dwmac  (inside a RK3288 SoC) connected to RTL8211 PHY
> The current upstream code for this case will call rk_gmac_exit() when
> the MAC suspends (after the PHY has already suspended). Effectively
> doing a phy_power_on(, false) which is calling regulator_disable() on
> the LDO defined by the 'phy-supply' attribute.
> So my reading is that the RK specific MAC code is turning off
> unconditionally the PHY power regulator. Unless I'm mistaken, either
> this code is incorrect for the WoL case or the naming 'phy-supply' is
> misleading and should be the MAC supply.

ok now clear. And you are right. I can conclude that the patch is ok
for me. I just ask you to resend it elaborating a bit the subject and
surrounding the code with a comment.

I do not know your SoC but indeed, when doing WoL, some parts of the
MAC + PHY must be powered so IMO it is legal that you do not cut
the power by invoking regulator.

Peppe