[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77eb25b2-d775-ec6f-c945-524d73113c96@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:57:31 +0200
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: jesse@...nel.org, jbenc@...hat.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com,
saeedm@...lanox.com, ariel.elior@...gic.com, tom@...bertland.com,
Dept-GELinuxNICDev@...gic.com, davem@...emloft.net,
eugenia@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 02/15] net: Merge VXLAN and GENEVE push notifiers
into a single notifier
Hi Alex,
very cool series!
On 13.06.2016 19:48, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index d101e4d904ba..e959b6348f91 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -1269,6 +1269,14 @@ struct net_device_ops {
> void (*ndo_del_geneve_port)(struct net_device *dev,
> sa_family_t sa_family,
> __be16 port);
> + void (*ndo_add_udp_enc_port)(struct net_device *dev,
> + sa_family_t sa_family,
> + __be16 port,
> + unsigned int type);
> + void (*ndo_del_udp_enc_port)(struct net_device *dev,
> + sa_family_t sa_family,
> + __be16 port,
> + unsigned int type);
> void* (*ndo_dfwd_add_station)(struct net_device *pdev,
> struct net_device *dev);
> void (*ndo_dfwd_del_station)(struct net_device *pdev,
What do you think about adding a struct as argument to
ndo_*_udp_enc_port? As a result we can much easier add new fields in
case future NICs allow us to e.g. specify a bound ip address?
Thanks,
Hannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists