netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:10:59 +0530
From:	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, matt@...abs.org, kda@...ux-powerpc.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net,
	ananth@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64

On 2016/06/10 10:47PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue,  7 Jun 2016 19:02:17 +0530
> 
> > Please note that patch [2] is a pre-requisite for this patchset, and is
> > not yet upstream.
>  ...
> > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2188694
> > [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/96514
> 
> Because of #2 I don't think I can take this directly into the networking
> tree, right?
> 
> Therefore, how would you like this to be merged?

Hi David,
Thanks for asking. Yes, I think it is better to take this through the 
powerpc tree as all the changes are contained within arch/powerpc, 
unless Michael Ellerman feels differently.

Michael?


Regards,
Naveen