netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 02/15] net: Merge VXLAN and GENEVE push notifiers into a single notifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALx6S35MsGtRyxYiOi389w05v8y=pG6fXZC3spj8OZKDTeh=Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2016 12:31:26 -0700
From:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...hat.com>
Cc:	Alexander Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>, Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>, ariel.elior@...gic.com,
	Dept-GELinuxNICDev@...gic.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, eugenia@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 02/15] net: Merge VXLAN and GENEVE push notifiers
 into a single notifier

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa
<hannes@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> very cool series!
>
> On 13.06.2016 19:48, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> index d101e4d904ba..e959b6348f91 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
>> @@ -1269,6 +1269,14 @@ struct net_device_ops {
>>       void                    (*ndo_del_geneve_port)(struct  net_device *dev,
>>                                                      sa_family_t sa_family,
>>                                                      __be16 port);
>> +     void                    (*ndo_add_udp_enc_port)(struct  net_device *dev,
>> +                                                    sa_family_t sa_family,
>> +                                                    __be16 port,
>> +                                                    unsigned int type);
>> +     void                    (*ndo_del_udp_enc_port)(struct  net_device *dev,
>> +                                                    sa_family_t sa_family,
>> +                                                    __be16 port,
>> +                                                    unsigned int type);
>>       void*                   (*ndo_dfwd_add_station)(struct net_device *pdev,
>>                                                       struct net_device *dev);
>>       void                    (*ndo_dfwd_del_station)(struct net_device *pdev,
>
> What do you think about adding a struct as argument to
> ndo_*_udp_enc_port? As a result we can much easier add new fields in
> case future NICs allow us to e.g. specify a bound ip address?
>
This is why I think we should be using ntuple filtering for
encapsulation instead perpetuating the notion that encapsulation
offload can only be done based on receive ports.

Tom

> Thanks,
> Hannes
>